Mechanisms exist to appropriately test and document proposed changes in a non-production environment before changes are implemented in a production environment.
Mechanisms exist to appropriately test and document proposed changes in a non-production environment before changes are implemented in a production environment.
Mechanisms exist to include a cybersecurity and/or data privacy representative in the configuration change control review process.
Automated mechanisms exist to implement remediation actions upon the detection of unauthorized baseline configurations change(s).
Mechanisms exist to govern assets involved in providing cryptographic protections according to the organization's configuration management processes.
Mechanisms exist to analyze proposed changes for potential security impacts, prior to the implementation of the change.
Mechanisms exist to enforce configuration restrictions in an effort to restrict the ability of users to conduct unauthorized changes.
Mechanisms exist to perform after-the-fact reviews of configuration change logs to discover any unauthorized changes.
Mechanisms exist to prevent the installation of software and firmware components without verification that the component has been digitally signed using an organization-approved certificate authority.
Mechanisms exist to enforce a two-person rule for implementing changes to critical assets.
Mechanisms exist to limit operational privileges for implementing changes.