Mechanisms exist to adequately train contingency personnel and applicable stakeholders in their contingency roles and responsibilities.
Mechanisms exist to adequately train contingency personnel and applicable stakeholders in their contingency roles and responsibilities.
Mechanisms exist to incorporate simulated events into contingency training to facilitate effective response by personnel in crisis situations.
Automated mechanisms exist to provide a more thorough and realistic contingency training environment.
Mechanisms exist to conduct tests and/or exercises to evaluate the contingency plan's effectiveness and the organization’s readiness to execute the plan.
Mechanisms exist to coordinate contingency plan testing with internal and external elements responsible for related plans.
Mechanisms exist to test contingency plans at alternate storage & processing sites to both familiarize contingency personnel with the facility and evaluate the capabilities of the alternate processing site to support contingency operations.
Mechanisms exist to conduct a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and "lessons learned" activity every time the contingency plan is activated.
Mechanisms exist to keep contingency plans current with business needs, technology changes and feedback from contingency plan testing activities.
Mechanisms exist to implement alternative or compensating controls to satisfy security functions when the primary means of implementing the security function is unavailable or compromised.
Mechanisms exist to establish an alternate storage site that includes both the assets and necessary agreements to permit the storage and recovery of system backup information.